Brief Historical Background

This section provides a compressed tour of history, which I hope will motivate indi­viduals to explore human aerial achievements in more detail. Many books cover the broad sweep of aeronautical history and many others depict particular cases such as famous people and their achievements in aeronautics ([1] is a good place to start). Innumerable Web sites on these topics exist; simply enter keywords such as Airbus, Boeing, or anything that piques your curiosity.

The desire to become airborne is ancient and it is reflected in our imagination and dreams. In the West, Daedalus and Icarus of Greek mythology were the first aviators; in the East, there are even more ancient myths – with no crashes. In Indian mythology, Pakshiraj is a white stallion with wings; the Greeks had a flying horse called Pegasus; and the Swedes also have flying horses. Garuda of Indonesia – half man and half bird – is another example from the Ramayana epic. Middle Eastern and South Asiatic “flying carpets” are seen in many Western cartoons and films. These contraptions are fully aerobatic with the ability to follow terrain; there are no seat belts and they can land inside rooms as well as on rooftops. Recreational possibilities and military applications abound!

Unfortunately, history is somewhat more “down to earth” than mythology, with early pioneers leaping from towers and cliffs, only to leave the Earth in a differ­ent but predictable manner because they underestimated the laws of nature. Our dreams and imagination became reality only about 100 years ago on December 17, 1903, with the first heavier-than-air flight by the Wright brothers. Yet, man first landed on the Moon about three decades ago, less than 70 years after the first powered flight.

The first scientific attempts to design a mechanism for aerial navigation were by Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) – he was the true grandfather of modern aviation, even if none of his machines ever defied gravity (Figure 1.1). He sketched many contraptions in his attempt to make a mechanical bird. However, birds possess such refined design features that the human path into the skies could not take that route; da Vinci’s ideas contradicted the laws of nature.

Подпись: Figure 1.2. Montgolfier balloon
Brief Historical Background

After da Vinci, and after an apparent lull for more than a century, the next prominent name is that of Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727). Perhaps we lack the doc­umentary evidence for I am convinced that human fascination with and endeavor for flight did not abate. Newton developed a theory of lift that although erroneous for low-speed flows, actually has some hypersonic application (although, of course, this was beyond his seventeenth-century understanding of fluid mechanics). Flight is essentially a practical matter, so real progress paralleled other industrial develop­ments (e. g., isolating gas for buoyancy).

In 1783, de Rozier and d’Arlandes were the first to effectively defy gravity, using a Montgolfier (France) balloon (Figure 1.2). For the first time, it was possi­ble to sustain and somewhat control altitude above the ground at will. However, these pioneers were subject to the prevailing wind direction and therefore were limited in their navigational options. To become airborne was an important land­mark in human endeavor. The fact that the balloonists did not have wings does not diminish the importance of their achievement. The Montgolfier brothers (Joseph and Etienne) should be considered among the fathers of aviation. In 1784, Blan­chard (France) added a hand-powered propeller to a balloon and was the first to make an aerial crossing of the English Channel on July 15,1765. Jules Verne’s fic­tional trip around the world in eighty days in a balloon became a reality when Steve Fossett circumnavigated the globe in fewer than fifteen days in 2002 – approximately three centuries after the first balloon circumnavigation.

In 1855, Joseph Pline was the first to use the word aeroplane in a paper he wrote proposing a gas-filled dirigible glider with a propeller.

Tethered kites flew in the Far East for a long time – in China, 600 B. C. How­ever, in 1804, Englishman Sir George Cayley constructed and flew a kite-like glider (Figure 1.3) with movable control surfaces – the first record of a successful heavier – than-air controllable machine to stay freely airborne. In 1842, English engineer Samuel Henson secured a patent on an aircraft design that was driven by a steam engine.

With his brother Gustav, Otto Lilienthal was successfully flying gliders (Fig­ure 1.4) in Berlin more than a decade (ca. 1890) before the Wright brothers’ first

Figure 1.3. Cayley’s kite glider

 

Brief Historical Background

experiments. His flights were controlled but not sustained. The overestimation of the power requirement for sustained flight (based on work by Sir Isaac Newton, among others) may have discouraged the attempts of the best enginemakers of the time in Germany to build an aircraft engine – it would have been too heavy. Sadly, Lilienthal’s aerial developments ended abruptly and his experience was lost when he died in a flying accident in 1896.

The question of who was the first to succeed naturally attracts a partisan spirit. The Wright Brothers (United States) are recognized as the first to achieve sustained, controlled flight of a heavier-than-air manned flying machine. Before discussing their achievement, however, some “also-rans” deserve mention (see various related Web sites). It is unfair not to credit John Stringfellow with the first powered flight of an unmanned heavier-than-air machine, made in 1848 in England. The French­man Ader also made a successful flight in his “Eole.” Gustav Weisskopf (White­head), a Bavarian who immigrated to the United States, claimed to have made a sustained, powered flight [2] on August 14,1901, in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Karl Jatho of Germany made a 200-ft hop (longer than the Wright Brothers first flight) with a powered (10-HP Buchet engine) flight on August 18,1903. At what distance a “hop” becomes a “flight” could be debated. Perhaps most significant are the efforts of Samuel P. Langley, who made three attempts to get his designs airborne with a pilot at the controls (Figure 1.5). His designs were aerodynamically superior to the Wright flyer, but the strategy to ensure pilot safety resulted in structural fail­ure while catapulting from a ramp toward water. (A replica of Langley’s aircraft was successfully flown from a conventional takeoff.) His model aircraft were flying successfully since 1902. The breaking of the aircraft also broke Professor Langley – a short time afterward, he died of a heart attack. The Wright Brothers were mere bicycle mechanics without any external funding, whereas Professor Langley was a highly qualified scientist whose project had substantial government funding.

Brief Historical Background
The discussion inevitably turns to the Wright Brothers. Their aircraft (Fig­ure 1.6) was inherently unstable but – good bicycle manufacturers that they were – they understood that stability could be sacrificed if sufficient control authority was maintained. They employed a foreplane for pitch control, which also served as a stall-prevention device – as today’s Rutan-designed aircraft have demonstrated.

Figure 1.5. Langley’s catapult launch

Brief Historical BackgroundExactly a century later, a flying replica model of the Wright flyer failed to lift off on its first flight. The success of the Wright Brothers was attributed to a freak gust of wind to assist the liftoff. A full-scale nonflying replica of the Wright flyer is on display at the Smithsonian Museum in Washington, DC, and the exhibit and others are well worth a trip.

Strangely, the Wright Brothers did not exploit their invention; however, hav­ing been shown that sustained and controlled flight was possible, a new genera­tion of aerial entrepreneurs quickly arose. Newer inventions followed in succession by pioneering names such as Santos Dumas, Bleriot, and Curtis, and the list grew rapidly. Each inventor presented a new contraption, some of which demonstrated genuine design improvements. Fame, adventure, and “Geftihl” (feelings) were the drivers; the first few years barely demonstrated any financial gain except through “joy rides” and air shows – spectacles never seen before then and still just as appeal­ing to the public now. It is interesting to observe the involvement of brothers from the eighteenth to the twentieth century – the Montgolfiers, du Temples, Lilienthas, and Wrights – perhaps they saw the future potential and wanted to keep progress confidential, and who can be better trusted than a brother?

Brief Historical Background

It did not take long to demonstrate the advantages of aircraft, such as in mail delivery and military applications. At approximately 100 miles per hour (mph), on average, aircraft were traveling three times faster than any surface vehicle – and in straight lines. Mail was delivered in less than half the time. The potential for mili­tary applications was dramatic and well demonstrated during World War I. About a decade after the first flight in 1903, aircraft manufacturing had become a lucrative business. I am privileged to have started my own aeronautical engineering career

with Short Brothers and Harland (now part of the Bombardier Aerospace group), a company that started aircraft manufacturing by contracting to fabricate the Wright designs. The company is now the oldest surviving aircraft manufacturer still in oper­ation. In 2008, it celebrated its centenary, the first aircraft company ever to do so.

The post-World War I aircraft industry geared up in defense applications and in civil aviation, with financial gain as the clear driver. The free-market economy of the West contributed much to aviation progress; its downside, possibly reflecting greed, was under-regulation. The proliferation showed signs of compromise with safety issues, and national regulatory agencies quickly stepped in, legislating for manda­tory compliance with airworthiness requirements. Today, every nation has its own regulatory agency. The FAA in the United States and the Joint Aviation Authority (JAA) in Europe (recently renamed EASA) are the most recognized.

Early aircraft design was centered on available engines, and the size of the air­craft depended on the use of multiple engines. The predominant material used was wood. The combination of engines, materials, and aerodynamic technology enabled aircraft speeds of approximately 200 mph; altitude was limited by human physiology. Junker demonstrated the structural benefit of thick wing sections and metal con­struction. In the 1930s, Durener Metallwerke of Germany introduced duralumin, with higher strength-to-weight ratios of isotropic material properties, and dramatic increases in speed and altitude resulted. The introduction of metal brought a new dimension to manufacturing technology. Structure, aerodynamics, and engine devel­opment paved the way for substantial gains in speed, altitude, and maneuvering capabilities. These improvements were seen preeminently in World War II designs such as the Supermarine Spitfire, the North American P-51, the Focke Wolfe 190, and the Mitsubishi Jeero-Sen. Multiengine aircraft also grew to sizes never before seen.

The invention of the jet engine (independently by Whittle of the United King­dom and von Ohain of Germany) realized the potential for unheard-of leaps in speed and altitude, resulting in parallel improvements in aerodynamics, materials, structures, and systems engineering. A better understanding of supersonic flow and a suitable rocket engine made it possible for Chuck Yeager to break the sound bar­rier in a Bell X1 in 1949. (The record-making aircraft is on exhibit at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum in Washington, DC.)

Less glamorous multiengine heavy-lifters were slower in progress but with no less success. Tens of thousands of the Douglas C-47 Dakota and Boeing B17 Flying Fortress were produced. Postwar, the De Havilland Comet was the first commercial jet aircraft in service; however, plagued by several tragic crashes, it failed to become the financial success it promised. (The first Comet crash occurred at Dum Dum, near Calcutta, in 1952, in a monsoon storm. At that time, I lived about 12 miles from the crash site.)

The 1960s and 1970s saw rapid progress with many new commercial and mili­tary aircraft designs boasting ever-increasing speed, altitude, and payload capabil­ities. Scientists made considerable gains in understanding the relevant branches of nature: in aerodynamic [3] issues concerning high lift and transonic drag; in mate­rials and metallurgy, improving the structural integrity; and in significant discov­eries in solid-state physics. Engineers made good use of the new understanding. Some of the outstanding designs of those decades emerged from the Lockheed

Company, including the F104 Starfighter, the U2 high-altitude reconnaissance air­craft, and the SR71 Blackbird. These three aircraft, each holding a world record of some type, were designed in Lockheed’s Skunk Works, located at the Los Ange­les airport, under the supervision of Clarence (Kelly) Johnson, who graduated from the University of Michigan (my alma mater). I recommend that readers study the design of the nearly 40-year-old SR71, which still holds the speed-altitude record for aircraft powered by air-breathing engines.

During the late 1960s, the modular approach to gas turbine technology gave aircraft designers the opportunity to match aircraft requirements (i. e., mission spec­ifications and economic considerations) with “rubberized” engines. This was an important departure from the 1920s and 1930s, when aircraft sizing was based around multiples of fixed-size engines. The core high-pressure gas turbine module could now be integrated with an appropriate low-pressure compressor, and turbine modules could offer designs with more than 50% thrust variation from the largest to the smallest in a family of derivatives. This advancement resulted in the develop­ment of families of aircraft design. Plugging the fuselage and, if necessary, allowing wing growth covered a wider market area at a lower development cost because con­siderable component commonality could be retained in a family: a cost-reduction design strategy – that is, “design one and get the other at half price.”

Rocket-powered aircraft first appeared during World War II. The advent and success of the Rutan-designed Space Ship One in 2004 (see Figure 1.14) to the fringes of the atmosphere will certainly bring about the large market potential of rocket-powered airplanes. Rocketry first entered the Western European experience when Tippu Sultan used rockets against the British-led Indian army at the Battle of Srirangapatnum in 1792. The propellants were based on a Chinese formula nearly a thousand years old. Many people are unaware that the experience of Tippu’s rock­ets led the British to develop missiles at the Royal Laboratory of Woolwich Arsenal, under the supervision of Sir William Congrave, in the late eighteenth century. Von Braun [4] mentions that he took the idea from Tippu’s success for his V2 rocket, paving the way for today’s achievement in space flight as an expanded envelope beyond winged flight vehicles.

There was a time when designers could make sketches to generate candidate configurations, sometimes stretching to exotic “star-wars” shapes; gradually, how­ever, creating ideas with a pencil has diminished. Capitalistic objectives render designers quite conservative, forcing them to devote considerably more time to anal­ysis. The next section discusses why commercial aircraft designs are similar, with the exception of a few one-off, special-purpose vehicles. Military designs emerge from more extensive analysis – for example, the strange-looking Northrop F117 is config­ured using stealth features to minimize radar signature. Now, more matured stealth designs look conventional; however, some aircraft are still exotic (e. g., the Lockheed F22).