The Human Pilot

Although the analysis and understanding of the dynamics of the airplane as an iso­lated unit is extremely important, one must be careful not to forget that for many flight situations it is the response of the total system, made up of the human pilot and the aircraft, that must be considered. It is for this reason that the designers of aircraft should apply the findings of studies into the human factors involved in order to en­sure that the completed system is well suited to the pilots who must fly it.

Some of the areas of consideration include:

1. Cockpit environment; the occupants of the vehicle must be provided with oxygen, warmth, light, and so forth, to sustain them comfortably.

2. Instrument displays; instruments must be designed and positioned to provide a useful and unambiguous flow of information to the pilot.

3. Controls and switches; the control forces and control system dynamics must be acceptable to the pilot, and switches must be so positioned and designed as to prevent accidental operation. Tables 1.1 to 1.3 present some pilot data con­cerning control forces.

4. Pilot workload; the workload of the pilot can often be reduced through proper planning and the introduction of automatic equipment.

Table 1.1

Estimates of the Maximum Rudder Forces that Can Be Exerted for Various Positions of the Rudder Pedal (BuAer, 1954)

Rudder Pedal Position

Distance from Back of Seat

Pedal Force

(in)

(cm)

(lb)

(N)

Back

31.00

78.74

246

1,094

Neutral

34.75

88.27

424

1,886

Forward

38.50

97.79

334

1,486

Table 1.2

Hand-Operated Control Forces (From Flight Safety Foundation Human Engineering Bulletin 56-5H) (see figure in Table 1.3)

Direction of Movement

180°

150°

120°

90°

60°

Pull

Rt. hand

52

(231)

56

(249)

42

(187)

31

(165)

24

(107)

Values given

represent

maximum

exertable

force in

pounds

(Newtons)

by the 5

percentile

man.

Lft. hand

50

(222)

42

(187)

34

(151)

32

(142)

26

(116)

Push

Rt. hand

50

(222)

42

(187)

36

(160)

36

(160)

34

(151)

Lft. hand

42

(187)

30

(133)

26

(116)

22

(98)

22

(98)

Up

Rt. hand

14

(62)

18

(80)

24

(107)

20

(89)

20

(89)

Lft. hand

9

(40)

15

(67)

17

(76)

17

(76)

15

(67)

Down

Rt. hand

17

(76)

20

(89)

26

(116)

26

(116)

20

(89)

Lft. hand

13

(58)

18

(80)

21

(93)

21

(93)

18

(80)

Outboard

Rt. hand

14

(62)

15

(67)

15

(67)

16

(71)

17

(76)

Lft. hand

8

(36)

8

(36)

10

(44)

10

(44)

12

(53)

Inboard

Rt. hand

20

(89)

20

(89)

22

(98)

18

(80)

20

(89)

Lft. hand

13

(58)

15

(67)

20

(89)

16

(71)

17

(76)

Note: The above results are those obtained from unrestricted movement of the subject. Any force required to overcome garment restriction would reduce the effective forces by the same amount.

Table 1.3

Rates of Stick Movement in Flight Test Pull-ups Under Various Loads (BuAer, 1954)

Maximum Stick

Average Rate of Stick

Time for Full

Pull-up

Load

Motion

Deflection

(lb)

(N)

(in/s)

(cm/s)

(s)

1

35

156

51.85

131.70

0.162

2

74

329

15.58

39.57

0.475

3

77

343

11.00

27.94

0.600

4

97

431

10.27

26.09

0.750

The Human Pilot

The care exercised in considering the human element in the closed-loop system made up of pilot and aircraft can determine the success or failure of a given aircraft design to complete its mission in a safe and efficient manner.

Many critical tasks performed by pilots involve them in activities that resemble those of a servo control system. For example, the execution of a landing approach through turbulent air requires the pilot to monitor the aircraft’s altitude, position, atti­tude, and airspeed and to maintain these variables near their desired values through the actuation of the control system. It has been found in this type of control situation that the pilot can be modeled by a linear control system based either on classical con­trol theory or optimal control theory (Etkin, 1972; Kleinman et al., 1970; McRuer and Krendel, 1973).