Investigated Flow Cases

The aim of the experiments was to investigate the behavior of a cascade running into flitter. In order to decrease the reduced frequency

* о / cred / A ч

U) — Z7T —- (4)

Vi

with respect to the same infbw velocity v i the cascade was tuned to a lower torsional blade eigenfrequency. So it was possible to investigate an unstable aeroelastic condition at a transonic fbw case, which had been previously in­vestigated.

Table 1. Steady upstream and downstream fbw parameters

Transonic Reference Case

Flutter Case

u*

0.362

0.289

Upstream:

Downstream:

Upstream:

Downstream:

Ma

0.87

0.72

0.90

0.75

P

50.3 °

41.5 °

50.4°

40.1 °

Pt

1323 mbar

1254 mbar

1397 mbar

1311 mbar

V

814 mbar

854 mbar

836 mbar

834 mbar

The transonic fbw condition is characterized by the occurrence of a front shock at x/c & 0.25…0.35 and a channel shock at x/c & 0.65…0.85 on the suction side and at x/c & 0.25…0.35 on the pressure side (Fig. 7b). In – and out-fbw parameters are mentioned in Table 1. Releasing the hydraulic brake at this fbw condition, it was possible to set the blade assembly to controlled pitching oscillations around midchord for each interblade phase angle and to measure the unsteady pressure distribution up to a pitching amplitude of ap­proximate 0.1° in order to determine the aerodynamic damping following the "aerodynamic approach". The excitation frequency of 177 Hz was choosen slighly below the eigenfrequency of the blades in order to distuinguish forced and free vibrations in the frequency range. This excitation frequency corre­sponds to a reduced frequency cj* = 0.289. Exceeding this amplitude the cascade starts to vibrate with a frequency of 182 Hz (“Flutter Case” Table 1).

Подпись: Figure 7a. Steady pressure distribution (Cp) of the transonic ref. case (>•* = 0.362)
Investigated Flow Cases

With the same cascade, an aerodynamic damping investigations was per­formed following the "aerodynamic approach" with each blade tuned to a higher eigenfrequency and excited at 215 Hz (cc* = 0.362). Here the cas­cade remained aerodynamically and aeroelastically stable (‘Transonic Refer­ence Case” Table 1).

Figure 7b. Steady pressure distribution (Cp) of the Hitler case (w * — 0.289)