UNSTEADY MOTION OF A SLENDER WING

As the simplest example for the conversion of a three-dimensional wing theory to the time-dependent mode, consider the planar motion of a slender wing in the x, z plane.13 5 (This is a three degrees of freedom motion with X, Z, and в as shown in Fig. 13.21.) Since for a slender wing the longitudinal dimension is much larger than the other two dimensions (x »y, z) we can assume that the derivatives are inversely affected such that:

Подпись: (13.75)

image598

э_ д_ d_

Эх ^ dy ’ dz

Подпись: V2<D Подпись: Э2Ф Э2Ф ду2 + dz2 Подпись: (13.76)

As in the case of the steady-state flow over slender wings and bodies, substitution of this condition into the continuity equation (Eq. (13.12)) allows us to neglect the first term, compared to the other derivatives:

This suggests that the crossflow effect is dominant, and for any x = const, station, a local two-dimensional solution is sufficient. An interesting aspect of this simplification is that the wake influence is negligible, too, as long as the longitudinal time variations (e. g., wing’s forward acceleration) are small.

The slender, thin lifting surface with a chord length of c is shown schematically in Fig. 13.21. At t = 0 the wing is at rest in the inertial system X, Y, Z, and at f > 0 it moves along a time-dependent curved path, S (for this particular case S is assumed to be two-dimensional). For convenience, the coordinates x, z are selected such that the origin О is placed on the path 5, and the x coordinate is always tangent to the path. The wing shape (camberline) is given in this coordinate system by r/(x, t), which is considered to be small (jj/c«1, since small-disturbance motion is assumed). Also, the normal component of the kinematic velocity is small (e. g., ec/U(t) « 1).

The time-dependent version of the boundary condition requiring no normal flow across the surface (at any x = const, station) for this case is given by Eq. (13.50):

image599

image600

(13.77)

where Ф is the wing’s perturbation potential and the subscript В is not used for the slender wing case (since the wake effect is neglected).

ЭФ 1 fb(xV2

w(x, y, 0±, t) = — = — ГІУо, *)

OZ In J-b(x)l2

Подпись: 13.9.1 Kinematics
Подпись: In the body coordinate system shown in Fig. 13.21, the chordwise downwash W(x, t) (assuming small disturbance flow) is given by Eq. (13.55):
Подпись: дп ЭФ„ дп
Подпись: (13.55)
Подпись: where the smaller terms were neglected. As a result of the slenderness assumption, also the wake influence can be neglected and the chordwise downwash becomes
Подпись: W(x, t) = U^-dx+^- v ’ Эх dt
Подпись: (13.78)
Подпись: Let us now follow Section 8.2.2 and model the crossflow (shown in Fig. 8.18) at any jc-station by a vortex distribution y(y, t). The perturbation velocity potential is given then by Eq. (8.69): 1 (Ы,х)П z Ф(дг, у, z, t) = — y(y0, t) tan-1 -dy0 (13.79) 2л J-b(x)/2 (У — Уо) The velocity components in the x = const, plane, due to this velocity potential, are
Подпись: / .4 ЗФ ^Y(y,0 v(x, y, 0±, t) = — = T —-—
Подпись: dy0
Подпись: (У-Уо)
UNSTEADY MOTION OF A SLENDER WING

and it is clear that y, U, rf, and в are functions of time. Comparing this form of the boundary condition with the formulation for high-aspect-ratio wings (Eq. (8.11)) clearly indicates that due to the slender-wing assumption the effect of the vortex lines parallel to the у axis (including the time-dependent portion of the wake) were neglected.