Correlation of Rotor Tip Vortex Data
Figure 10.23 shows results derived from the tip vortex measurements in terms of an equivalent maximum nondimensional tangential velocity as a function of equivalent
nonuimensionai downstream distance irom tne up oi me oiaue. rouowmg an approacn similar to Iversen (1976), we can write the nondimensional velocity and distance (in terms of vortex or “wake” age) as
(10.34)
(10.35)
(10.36)
Substituting V0max = rv(l – e “)/2nrc, and using Eqs. 10.34 and 10.35, gives
(10.37)
As shown previously, the Lamb-Oseen result can be modified empirically to include an average effective (turbulent) viscosity coefficient, 8, that is, Eq. 10.37 can be written as
(10.38)
Comparing this with Iversen’s results in Fig. 10.23, we see that Iversen’s correlation is equivalent to including an effective turbulent viscosity coefficient that is proportional to the vortex Reynolds number, Tv/v. The peak velocity trend shown in Fig. 10.23 corresponds to the core growth trend
(10.39)
The ordinate shift, if/WQ, results in a effective nonzero core radius, ro, at the tip vortex origin where x(fw = 0C and, therefore, a finite velocity at d = 0. However, in the other two models (i. e,, Lamb-Oseen and Squire models) the swirl velocity is singular at the origin of the tip vortex and unrealistically high at small distances (wake ages). However, at large downstream distances (wake ages), all three curves show the same qualitative trend, that is the velocity is inversely related to л/t (i. e., Vemax a or equivalently, the core radius increases in
proportion to л/t (i. e., rc OC fH2).
The viscous core growth trend as a function of wake age as derived from the above correlation trend has been plotted in Figure 10.22, along with the Lamb (laminar) result and a Lamb-type trend with a higher (constant) effective turbulent viscosity. Again, the differences between the two curves are obvious at early equivalent wake ages. At later wake ages, the two curves have a qualitatively similar behavior. At large wake ages, they will be almost coincident, that is
(10.40)