Category UNSTEADY INCOMPRESSIBLE POTENTIAL FLOW

The continuity equation (Eq. (13.12)) is exactly the same as the corresponding steady-state equation and consequently solution methods similar to those presented in the previous (steady-state flow) chapters can be used. Recalling the formulation, based on Green’s identity (Section 3.3), the general solution to Eq. (13.12) can be constructed by integrating the contribution of the basic solutions of source a and doublet ц distributions over the body’s surface and its wakes:

Ф(х, у, z) = – і – f цп • v(-) dS – j – [ a(-) dS (13.15)

4ТГ Jbody+wake /*/ 4jT Jbody

This formulation does not include directly a vortex distribution; however it was demonstrated earlier (e. g., in Section 10.4.3) that doublet distributions can be exchanged with equivalent vortex distributions. Also, from this point and on, the velocity potential Ф is considered to be specified in terms of the body’s coordinate system.

This singular element solution automatically fulfills the boundary condi­tion of Eq. (13.5). To satisfy the boundary condition of Eq. (13.13), Eq. (13.15) is differentiated with respect to the body coordinates. The resulting velocity induced by the combination of the doublet and source distributions is then

In order to establish the Neumann form of the boundary value problem, the local velocity at each point on the body has to satisfy the zero-flow condition across the body’s surface (Eq. (13.13)) or, in the case of transpiration, Eq. (13.13b). By substituting Eq. (13.16) into Eq. (13.13a), the final integral equation is formed with the unknown ц and о distributions

For thick bodies, this condition of zero normal flow across solid boundaries can be defined by using the Dirichlet formulation of Section 9.2. In this case the inner perturbation potential is assumed to be constant such that

Ф; = const.

By selecting Ф, = 0 for the velocity potential (observe that the problem is formulated in the inertial X, Y, Z frame of reference where Ф* = 0, and the
magnitude of Ф corresponds to the perturbation potential[3] in the steady-state flow case) a formulation similar to that appearing in Eq. (9.11) is obtained:

Eqs. (13.17) and (13.18) still do not uniquely describe a solution, since a large number of source and doublet distributions will satisfy a set of such boundary conditions. It is possible to set the doublet strength or the source strength to zero, in a manner similar to the thick and thin airfoil cases (as in Chapter 11). A frequently followed choice for panel methods (e. g., PMARC96,97) is to set the value of the source distribution equal to the local kinematic velocity (the time-dependent equivalent of the free-stream velocity). In order to justify this, observe the Neumann boundary condition of Eq. (13.13a), which states that on the solid boundary,

дФ

— = (V0 + vrel + П X r) • n

But Eq. (3.12) states that the jump in the local normal velocity component is

дФ ЭФ,

° dn dn

and since Ф, = 0 then also ЭФJdn =0 on the solid boundary SB. Consequently, the source strength is

a= – n • (V0 + vre, + £2 X r) (13.19)

When treating time-dependent motions of bodies, the selection of the coordinate systems becomes very important. It is useful to describe the unsteady motion of the surface on which the “zero normal flow” boundary condition is applied in a body-fixed coordinate system (де, y, z), as shown for the example of a maneuvering wing in Fig. 13.1. The motion of the origin О of this coordinate system (x, y, z) is then prescribed in an inertial frame of reference (X, Y, Z) and is assumed to be known (as shown in Fig. 13.1). For simplicity, assume that at f = 0 the inertial frame (X, Y, Z) coincides with the frame (x, y, z). Then, at t > 0, the relative motion of the origin ( )0 of the body-fixed frame of reference is prescribed by its location Ro(f), and the instantaneous orientation of this frame is ©(f), where (ф, в, ip) are the rotation angles.

(X0, y0,Z0) = Ro(f) (13.1)

(<*>, в, xp) = 0(f) (13.2)

For example, in the case of a constant-velocity flow of speed in the positive x direction (in the wing’s frame of reference in Fig. 13.1) the function Ro(f)

FIGURE 13.1

Inertial and body coordinates used to describe the motion of the body.

will be

(X0, Y0, Z„) = (~Uxt, 0, 0)

which means that the wing is being translated in the negative X direction.

The fluid surrounding the body is assumed to be inviscid, irrotational, and incompressible over the entire flow field, excluding the body’s solid boundaries and its wakes. Therefore, a velocity potential Ф(Л’, Y, Z) can be defined in the inertial frame and the continuity equation, in this frame of reference, becomes

V2<f> = 0 (in X, Y, Z coordinates) (13.3)

and the first boundary condition requiring zero normal velocity across the body’s solid boundaries is

(УФ + v) • n = 0 (in X, Y, Z coordinates) (13.4)

Here —v is the surface’s velocity and n = n(Ar, У, Z, f) is the vector normal to this moving surface, as viewed from the inertial frame of reference. (Note that v is defined with the minus sign so that the surface velocity will be positive in the body’s frame of reference.) Since Eq. (13.3) does not depend directly on time, the time dependency is introduced through this boundary condition (e. g., the location and orientation of n can vary with time). It is interesting to point out that Ф is the total velocity potential, but as a result of its definition in a frame that is attached to the undisturbed fluid its magnitude is small (in fact it is similar to the perturbation potential of Section 4.2).

The second boundary condition requires that the flow disturbance, due to the body’s motion through the fluid, should diminish far from the body (or wing in Fig. 13.1):

lim УФ = 0 (13.5)

|R-Rol—

where R = (X, Y, Z).

For the unsteady flow case the use of the Kelvin condition will supply an additional equation that can be used to determine the streamwise strength of the vorticity shed into the wake. In general, it states that in the potential flow region the angular momentum cannot change, thus the circulation Г around a fluid curve enclosing the wing and its wake is conserved:

jp

— = 0 (for any t) (13.6)

at

The solution of this problem, which becomes time-dependent because of the boundary condition (Eq. (13.4)), is easier in the body-fixed coordinate system. Consequently, a transformation f between the coordinate systems has to be established, based on the flight path information of Eqs. (13.1) and

(13.2) :

Such a transformation should include the translation and the rotation of the (x, y, z) system, and can be found in any basic dynamics text book and, for example, may have the form:

/x /1 0 0 / cos 0(f) 0 sin 0(f)

І у | = | 0 cos 0(f) – sin 0(f) If 0 1 О I

zj sin 0(f) cos 0(f) /-sin0(f) 0 cos 0(f)/

cos 0(f) – sin 0(f) 0/X — X0 sin 0(f) cos 0(f) Ojl Y-Y0 I (13.7a)

0 0 l/Z-Zo/

Similarly, the kinematic velocity v of the surface due to the motion of the wing in Fig. 13.1, as viewed in the body frame of reference, is given by

v=—[Vo + fiXr] (13.8)

where V0 is the velocity of the (де, у, z) system’s origin, resolved into the instantaneous (x, y, z) directions

Уо = (ЛГ0, Y0,Z0) (13.9a)

Here r= (x, y, z) is the position vector and Q is the rate of rotation of the body’s frame of reference, as shown in Fig. 13.1,

П = (0,0,0) (13.9b)

In situations when an additional relative motion vre, within the (дг, у, z) system is desired (e. g., small-amplitude oscillation of a wing or its flap, in addition to the average motion of the body system) then Eq. (13.8) becomes

v= -[V0 + vrel + ftXr] (13.8a)

and

Vi = (x, y,z) (13.9c)

To an observer in the (x, y, z) frame, the velocity direction is opposite to the flight direction (as derived in the X, Y, Z frame) and therefore the minus sign appears in Eq. (13.8).

The proper transformation of Eqs. (13.3)-(13.5) into the body’s frame of reference requires the evaluation of the various derivatives in the (x, y, z) system. This can be found using the standard chain-rule differentiation and for example the 9/ dX term becomes

9 _ дх 9 ду 9 9z 9 ЭХ ~ 9X 9x + 9X Эу + ЭХ 9z

Here, 9x/9X, 9y/9X, 9z/9X include the information about the instantaneous orientation of the body-fixed frame of reference (it is also assumed that the time t is the same in both frames). For example, consider the case when the body frame of reference of Fig. 13.1 translates to the left and only one degree

But it is possible to transform Eqs. (13.3) and (13.4) into the body’s frame of reference without explicitly knowing Eq. (13.7) and still arrive at the same conclusions. For example, at any moment the continuity equation is independ­ent of the coordinate system orientation and the mass should be conserved. Therefore, the quantity У2Ф is independent of the instantaneous coordinate system and the continuity equation in terms of (x, y, z) remains unchanged (the reader is encouraged to prove this by using the chain rule):

У2Ф = 0 (in x, y, z coordinates) (13.12)

Also, the two boundary conditions (Eqs. (13.4) and (13.5)) should state the same physical conditions. The gradient 7Ф will have the same magnitude and direction and the kinematic velocity v is given by Eq. (13.8) and therefore the zero-velocity normal to a solid surface boundary condition, in the body frame becomes

(УФ + v) • n = 0 (in jc, y, z coordinates) (13.13)

Here n is the normal to the body’s surface, in terms of the body coordinates (x, y, z).

By using Eq. (13.8a) with vrc, representing the motion of the body in the (x, y, z) coordinates, Eq. (13.13) becomes

(Уф — V0 – vre, – Я X r) • n = 0 (in x, y, z coordinates) (13.13a)

Note that this boundary condition can be derived directly by using Eq. (2.27) of Chapter 2. According to that terminology, the surface is defined in the body frame of reference by F as

F = z – r](x, y, t) = 0

Applying Eq. (2.24) (DF/Dt = 0) in the (X, Y, Z) coordinate system where the particles move with a velocity УФ yields

dF

—-—(- УФ • V F = 0

dt

Transferring this expression into the (x, y, z) system requires the transforma­tion of the dF/dt term by using Eq. (13.11) and with the second term remaining unchanged this becomes

9F

— – (V0 + ft X r) • VF + УФ • VF = 0

Recalling that in the body’s frame of reference dF/dt = – dr/dt and according to Eq. (2.26) VF/|VF| =n we get

[УФ — (V0 + ft X r)]

The last term represents the relative motion within the body’s frame of reference and by exchanging dr/dt/VF with a possible three-dimensional relative motion vrei • n we get

[УФ – (V0 + ft X r)] • n – vre| • n = 0

which is identical to the previous result of Eq. (13.13a).

In the case of more complex flowfields, when the modeling of nonzero velocity components across the boundaries is desired (e. g., engine inlet/exit flows or simulation of boundary layer displacement by blowing) a transpiration velocity VN can be added:

(УФ – V0- vrel – ft X r) • n= VN (13.136)

The most important conclusion from these results (Eqs. (13.12) and

(13.13) ) is that for incompressible flows the instantaneous solution is inde­pendent of time derivatives. That is, since the speed of sound is assumed to be infinite, the influence of the momentary boundary condition is immediately radiated across the whole fluid region. Therefore, steady-state solution techniques can be used to treat the time-dependent problem by substituting the instantaneous boundary condition (Eq. (13.13)) at each moment. The wake shape, however, does depend on the time history of the motion and consequently an appropriate vortex wake model has to be developed.

For many situations involving lifting problems the wake separation line has to be prescribed. As in the case of the steady-state flows the Kutta condition is assumed to be valid for the time-dependent case as well (for attached flows with reduced frequencies of less than 1 where the reduced a)L

frequency is defined in a manner similar to Eq. (1.52)). Therefore,

along trailing edges of lifting surfaces, the velocity has to be finite (to fix the
rear stagnation line) and

УФ < oo (at trailing edges)

We have seen in the previous chapters that in an incompressible, irrotational fluid the velocity field can be obtained by solving the continuity equation. How?-er, the incompressible continuity equation does not directly include time-dependent terms, and the time dependency is introduced through the soundary conditions. Therefore, it will be shown that the methods of solution – t ‘-re developed for steady flows can be used with only small modifica – These modifications will include the treatment of the “zero normal-flow з і a solid-surface” boundary conditions and the use of the unsteady Bernoulli er;:".tion. Also, as a result of the nonuniform motion, the wake becomes more c ilex than in the corresponding steady flow case and it should properly be amounted for. Consequently this chapter is divided into three parts, as follows:

1. Formulation of the problem and of the proposed modifications for converting steady-state flow methods to treat unsteady flows (Sections 13.1-13.6)

2. Examples of converting analytical models to treat time-dependent flows (e. g., thin lifting airfoil and slender wing in Sections 13.8-13.9)

3. Examples of converting numerical models to treat time-dependent flows (Sections 13.10-13.13)

For the numeric examples only the simplest models are presented; however, application of the approach to any of the other methods of Chapter 11 is strongly recommended (e. g., can be given as a student project).

In the general case of the arbitrary motion of a solid body submerged in a fluid (e. g., a maneuvering wing or aircraft) the motion path is determined by the combined dynamic and fluid dynamic equations. However, this chapter will deal with the loads generated by the fluid only and therefore the path along which the body (or the wing or aircraft) moves is assumed to be prescribed.